| nettime's semantic descrambler on Thu, 2 Aug 2001 22:56:24 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Empire: pdf and ebook: is there much difference? [2x] |
Table of Contents:
Re: <nettime> empire pdf (pdf empire)
"R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>
Re: <nettime> empire pdf (pdf empire)
Laurent Oget <loget@zvolve.com>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 23:23:52 -0400
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: <nettime> empire pdf (pdf empire)
At 11:32 AM -0400 on 8/1/01, Laurent Oget wrote:
> It is an ENCRYPTED PDF document
No, once again, (and in a lower tone of voice :-)), the document in
question, a PDF version of "Empire", was just a PDF document.
If you have a PDF reader, and, like I said, there are *other* pdf readers
out there besides Adobe's, even in open-source form, and free-as-in-beer or
free-as-in-speech, I expect, and, if you want, you can read it withh one of
those.
In fact, someone *here* just converted it to text, right? I'm not a
gambling man, bit I would bet, if I were, that *they* converted it without
recourse to Adobe software.
Again, the current cryptographer-in-jail flap is about the *e-book*
software, that Adobe has put out, which is different from PDF.
Same thing, but different. Apples and Oranges, or whatever.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
RAH
- --
- -----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 01:43:47 -0400
From: Laurent Oget <loget@zvolve.com>
Subject: Re: <nettime> empire pdf (pdf empire)
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:23:52PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> At 11:32 AM -0400 on 8/1/01, Laurent Oget wrote:
>
>
> > It is an ENCRYPTED PDF document
>
>
> No, once again, (and in a lower tone of voice :-)), the document in
> question, a PDF version of "Empire", was just a PDF document.
>
whose 'file info' is, as the original poster mentioned:
Security Method: Acrobat Standard Security
User Password: No
Master Password: Yes
Printing: Not Allowed
Content Copying or Extraction: Not Allowed
Authoring Comments and Form Fields: Not Allowed
Form Field-Fill-in or Signing: Not Allowed
Content Accessibility Enabled: Not Allowed
Document Assembly: Not Allowed
Encryption Level: 40-bit RC4 (Acrobat 3.x, 4.x)
> If you have a PDF reader, and, like I said, there are *other* pdf readers
> out there besides Adobe's, even in open-source form, and free-as-in-beer or
> free-as-in-speech, I expect, and, if you want, you can read it withh one of
> those.
>
> In fact, someone *here* just converted it to text, right? I'm not a
> gambling man, bit I would bet, if I were, that *they* converted it without
> recourse to Adobe software.
>
sebastian did. if you read his mail, which mention a decrypted PDF
version at http://excsess4all.com, you might suspect that he used the
pdf password recovery software from elcomsoft.
>
> Again, the current cryptographer-in-jail flap is about the *e-book*
> software, that Adobe has put out, which is different from PDF.
>
so you think. adobe did not come up with two different ways to de-free text.
> Same thing, but different. Apples and Oranges, or whatever.
>
be it an apple or an orange that you put in the adobe steel box, you
won't be able to eat it.
------------------------------
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net